I watched the debate last Friday on CSpan. It was disheartening to hear the disingenous Repub arguments, they have already decided to vote no, now time to backfill for reasons why. Um, hoaxy? Al Gore-rrible? Economy? (sorry guys, all of those are weak!)
Among Dems, the highlight of the debate was Rep. John Larson (CT? I'm pretty sure, although after awhile the talking heads seem to blur together, sorry if it wasn't him) who gave a great speech about how we are sending so much money for oil to Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Venezuela, that the Repubs should be ashamed of voting against this because they are supporting our enemies and contributing to terrorism (or something like that). It was a way stronger argument than some of the flimsy green jobs stuff which sounds a little like “just wait another 10 years and we’ll have a hydrogen car, we promise.”
Monday, June 29, 2009
Friday, June 26, 2009
Some Music and Videos of Hope
A tribute to Michael Jackson, and hoping that we can solve the problems of the world.
"We are the World" - An anthem of hope, great 80's cameos.
"Man in the Mirror" - A good song to listen to if you are thinking of becoming vegetarian.
"Smooth Criminal" - looks like he was protesting the WTO and the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle police started getting violent.
"You are not Alone" - I like the Olive song by that name too.
"Heal the World" - sort of cheesy, but a good kids song, nice anti-war sentiment.
"Earth Song" - really good, put that pollution back into the smokestack.
"Feed the World" - this isn't Michael Jackson, but I think his work helped inspire it, plus I was on a roll, and more 80's cameos.
"We are the World" - An anthem of hope, great 80's cameos.
"Man in the Mirror" - A good song to listen to if you are thinking of becoming vegetarian.
"Smooth Criminal" - looks like he was protesting the WTO and the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle police started getting violent.
"You are not Alone" - I like the Olive song by that name too.
"Heal the World" - sort of cheesy, but a good kids song, nice anti-war sentiment.
"Earth Song" - really good, put that pollution back into the smokestack.
"Feed the World" - this isn't Michael Jackson, but I think his work helped inspire it, plus I was on a roll, and more 80's cameos.
Gaia's Future Debated in the House
It's a day that Bill McKibben, Carl Pope, Stephen Schneider, James Lovelock and Gaia itself have been waiting for. HR.2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), the House's first serious attempt to address climate change, is on the House floor. Climate change is a serious challenge. We need to reduce our GHG emissions, and the consequences of not doing so are serious, perhaps threatening the continued existence of half of all species, perhaps eventually including our own.
Do any of these Congresspeople know what they are talking about? Very few have read the bill. It's over 1200 pages. How many Congresspeople understand cap and trade, at all? Or think they understand it, but really don't.
Especially the Republicans. I assume many of them understand that climate change is a problem, or at least are concerned about dependence on imported oil from the Middle East and elsewhere. But they have prioritized short-term power politics over the survival of God's creation, the Earth. The economic scare tactics, skepticism of science, callers on CSpan saying that global warming is a hoax. Mainly it seems they hate Al Gore, and this gives them a reason to announce it to people loudly. Interestingly, Al Gore is not even that liberal, but he stirs up memories of the 90's, which I guess for Repubs was a painful time, it was like Middle School and he was like the Assistant Principal, I guess. Even so, the Repugs are trying to fit what they can into their existing worldview, for example, saying that if there is a problem, it's because of those dark skinned people in the Amazon cutting those trees. If they could say global warming was caused by welfare mothers they would.
Blue Dog Democrats are scared of making any bold moves. Status quo coal and manufacturing control them.
I've been arguing that action on global warming is needed. And I've been pestering everyone around me about it for years going on decades now. But is this bill the right one? We are running out of time. Every year of delay is potentially fatal. Even so, the bill has been compromised. A well-respected analyst told me yesterday that at this point, the bill's main impact will be to pay money to corn farmers to make ethanol, with little or no emissions reductions. On the other hand, showing up to the international climate conference in Copenhagen in December with nothing from the U.S. would just prolong the Bush-era stalemate. China and India are right to say that the U.S. should go first. If those Repugnicans think our economic problems are bad, why don't they go there and tell them to reduce their emissions.
There is the head versus heart debate, or what I call the Christina Aguilera debate (my body's sayin let's go, but my heart is sayin no). For normal people, it's that we know the bill is flawed, but we hope that it will help in some way. I'm not sure which is the heart and which is the head, or in Christina's case, which is the T and which is the A (not as much in the head, sorry, uncalled for). For Repugs, it's that they want to oppose Obama's agenda and if they can personally insult Al Gore while doing so this gives them great pleasure, and if they can fit in some populist rhetoric about jobs (when they actually are the unions worst enemy the other 364 days of the year, and their free trade agenda has cost more jobs than this bill ever could) and the economy (which mainly consists of bank bailouts and ponzi schemes at this point right?), and on the other hand, the concessions in this bill might actually benefit their constituencies (industrial ag, Monsanto, the delay in switching off coal, keeping gas prices high which they say they oppose but they enjoy the campaign contributions from Exxon) but they are so blinded by Gore-hatred they refuse to recognize that, and cap and trade was originally a free market solutions that was an alternative to command and control regulation but if they aren't in front of the parade them they won't go I guess, and they often have grandchildren and like going outdoors, and there may be a small voice in the back of their mind that knows that they would feel bad if they were responsible for ending civilization. But that is a distant echo, which can be easily drowned out with Venezuelan hookers, whiskey, Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh.
350 ppm trumps politics. (many enviros think the tipping point for climate collapse will be 350 parts per million CO2 equivalent in the atmposphere, the IPCC sometimes refers to 450 ppm as a goal for 2050 or 2100, this blog has a graphic that shows our current ppm). But there's no silver bullet single solution to climate change, so we should support anything that reduces coal use. It's not clear if ACES will, but it might be a step towards it (squinting, wishing). Maybe strategic opposition can improve the bill, providing a story for the media to cover ("enviros say bill is too weak, allocations should go to consumers not utilities").
If ACES passes, which I think would be a victory for recognition of climate change as a problem, there will still be lots of work to be done, so don't hang up your hat and call it a day yet. Sorry, you can't take the rest of the day off.
Do any of these Congresspeople know what they are talking about? Very few have read the bill. It's over 1200 pages. How many Congresspeople understand cap and trade, at all? Or think they understand it, but really don't.
Especially the Republicans. I assume many of them understand that climate change is a problem, or at least are concerned about dependence on imported oil from the Middle East and elsewhere. But they have prioritized short-term power politics over the survival of God's creation, the Earth. The economic scare tactics, skepticism of science, callers on CSpan saying that global warming is a hoax. Mainly it seems they hate Al Gore, and this gives them a reason to announce it to people loudly. Interestingly, Al Gore is not even that liberal, but he stirs up memories of the 90's, which I guess for Repubs was a painful time, it was like Middle School and he was like the Assistant Principal, I guess. Even so, the Repugs are trying to fit what they can into their existing worldview, for example, saying that if there is a problem, it's because of those dark skinned people in the Amazon cutting those trees. If they could say global warming was caused by welfare mothers they would.
Blue Dog Democrats are scared of making any bold moves. Status quo coal and manufacturing control them.
I've been arguing that action on global warming is needed. And I've been pestering everyone around me about it for years going on decades now. But is this bill the right one? We are running out of time. Every year of delay is potentially fatal. Even so, the bill has been compromised. A well-respected analyst told me yesterday that at this point, the bill's main impact will be to pay money to corn farmers to make ethanol, with little or no emissions reductions. On the other hand, showing up to the international climate conference in Copenhagen in December with nothing from the U.S. would just prolong the Bush-era stalemate. China and India are right to say that the U.S. should go first. If those Repugnicans think our economic problems are bad, why don't they go there and tell them to reduce their emissions.
There is the head versus heart debate, or what I call the Christina Aguilera debate (my body's sayin let's go, but my heart is sayin no). For normal people, it's that we know the bill is flawed, but we hope that it will help in some way. I'm not sure which is the heart and which is the head, or in Christina's case, which is the T and which is the A (not as much in the head, sorry, uncalled for). For Repugs, it's that they want to oppose Obama's agenda and if they can personally insult Al Gore while doing so this gives them great pleasure, and if they can fit in some populist rhetoric about jobs (when they actually are the unions worst enemy the other 364 days of the year, and their free trade agenda has cost more jobs than this bill ever could) and the economy (which mainly consists of bank bailouts and ponzi schemes at this point right?), and on the other hand, the concessions in this bill might actually benefit their constituencies (industrial ag, Monsanto, the delay in switching off coal, keeping gas prices high which they say they oppose but they enjoy the campaign contributions from Exxon) but they are so blinded by Gore-hatred they refuse to recognize that, and cap and trade was originally a free market solutions that was an alternative to command and control regulation but if they aren't in front of the parade them they won't go I guess, and they often have grandchildren and like going outdoors, and there may be a small voice in the back of their mind that knows that they would feel bad if they were responsible for ending civilization. But that is a distant echo, which can be easily drowned out with Venezuelan hookers, whiskey, Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh.
350 ppm trumps politics. (many enviros think the tipping point for climate collapse will be 350 parts per million CO2 equivalent in the atmposphere, the IPCC sometimes refers to 450 ppm as a goal for 2050 or 2100, this blog has a graphic that shows our current ppm). But there's no silver bullet single solution to climate change, so we should support anything that reduces coal use. It's not clear if ACES will, but it might be a step towards it (squinting, wishing). Maybe strategic opposition can improve the bill, providing a story for the media to cover ("enviros say bill is too weak, allocations should go to consumers not utilities").
If ACES passes, which I think would be a victory for recognition of climate change as a problem, there will still be lots of work to be done, so don't hang up your hat and call it a day yet. Sorry, you can't take the rest of the day off.
Friday, June 12, 2009
6 versions of Terminator:Salvation that would have been an improvement
Here they are, in descending order from serious to just funny.
1) Terminator: What should have been
John Connor leads a small band of people just trying to survive. He comes across young Kyle Reese and acts as a father figure to him. They learn that Skynet is harvesting human tissue to make human-looking cyborgs to infiltrate the resistance. Their upcoming model is based on an Austrian weightlifter whose genome had been sequenced by CyberDyne. John captures and reprograms an experimental Terminator (Marcus). Skynet finds the resistance headquarters and captures everyone. Marcus pretends he is still a machine, but once back at Skynet headquarters, hacks into Skynet, locates John and Kyle, and is able to fight the other Terminators so that John and Kyle escape. Marcus’s last act before he dies is to upload a computer virus into Skynet that John Connor had created. It shuts down parts of Skynet, and the resistance takes over certain factories. As people hear about this, they come out of the woodwork, and this builds up the resistance from a few people to several thousand. Towards the end of the movie they find out that Skynet has repaired itself and is preparing a counterattack. Connor keeps trying to capture Terminators in order to reprogram them and find out how Skynet’s software works. Towards the end of the movie, something strange happens that implies that Skynet is working on time travel technology.
The soundtrack: Nine Inch Nails Year Zero, and The Day the Whole World Went Away
2) Terminator: Hackers
John Connor learned at the end of T3 that Skynet is software, and has infected the computers of the world. Therefore, logically, this next movie is about him trying to find out if any computer programmers survived Judgment Day so that they can try to hack into Skynet and turn it off. It becomes more of an intellectual thriller, as John Connor tries to figure out the structure of Skynet, and how he can communicate with hackers around the world without alerting Skynet to their plans. They may have to build a second Internet, use old WWI analog coding devices, or carrier pigeons.
Terminator: After the Bomb
John Connor has come up with some ingenious ways for the resistance to survive under Skynet’s radar. The movie revolves around how they had to rebuild from scratch all the things we take for granted. They had to develop anti-radiation pills or medications, they built a Biodiesel refinery so they would not be reliant on oil, which is controlled by the machines. Kate manages an organic greenhouse underground to grow food. We also find out which animals and plants survived Judgment Day, and which species began to mutate or evolve in the new ecology. Joseph Masco could work as a behind-the-scenes consultant for the film.
Terminator: The Basics
Like a video game, the camera follows John Connor around as he is attacked by robots in creative ways. That’s it.
Terminator: Salivation
The resistance has been living in bomb shelters like the one shown at the end of T3 for over 10 years eating canned beans. Finally, John Connor leads an expedition outside to see if anything edible survived the nuclear winter. Meanwhile, Kate attempts to start an organic community garden, using permaculture principles. It turns out that Kyle Reese really likes fresh fava beans.
Terminator: Under a Hot Moon
Moon Bloodgood strips to 80’s synthesizer techno from Term 1, GnR, Year Zero, Kraftwerk, and other robot related music. Perhaps the most successful of the proposed alternatives.
By the way, I've been enjoying reading the comments on this other blog.
1) Terminator: What should have been
John Connor leads a small band of people just trying to survive. He comes across young Kyle Reese and acts as a father figure to him. They learn that Skynet is harvesting human tissue to make human-looking cyborgs to infiltrate the resistance. Their upcoming model is based on an Austrian weightlifter whose genome had been sequenced by CyberDyne. John captures and reprograms an experimental Terminator (Marcus). Skynet finds the resistance headquarters and captures everyone. Marcus pretends he is still a machine, but once back at Skynet headquarters, hacks into Skynet, locates John and Kyle, and is able to fight the other Terminators so that John and Kyle escape. Marcus’s last act before he dies is to upload a computer virus into Skynet that John Connor had created. It shuts down parts of Skynet, and the resistance takes over certain factories. As people hear about this, they come out of the woodwork, and this builds up the resistance from a few people to several thousand. Towards the end of the movie they find out that Skynet has repaired itself and is preparing a counterattack. Connor keeps trying to capture Terminators in order to reprogram them and find out how Skynet’s software works. Towards the end of the movie, something strange happens that implies that Skynet is working on time travel technology.
The soundtrack: Nine Inch Nails Year Zero, and The Day the Whole World Went Away
2) Terminator: Hackers
John Connor learned at the end of T3 that Skynet is software, and has infected the computers of the world. Therefore, logically, this next movie is about him trying to find out if any computer programmers survived Judgment Day so that they can try to hack into Skynet and turn it off. It becomes more of an intellectual thriller, as John Connor tries to figure out the structure of Skynet, and how he can communicate with hackers around the world without alerting Skynet to their plans. They may have to build a second Internet, use old WWI analog coding devices, or carrier pigeons.
Terminator: After the Bomb
John Connor has come up with some ingenious ways for the resistance to survive under Skynet’s radar. The movie revolves around how they had to rebuild from scratch all the things we take for granted. They had to develop anti-radiation pills or medications, they built a Biodiesel refinery so they would not be reliant on oil, which is controlled by the machines. Kate manages an organic greenhouse underground to grow food. We also find out which animals and plants survived Judgment Day, and which species began to mutate or evolve in the new ecology. Joseph Masco could work as a behind-the-scenes consultant for the film.
Terminator: The Basics
Like a video game, the camera follows John Connor around as he is attacked by robots in creative ways. That’s it.
Terminator: Salivation
The resistance has been living in bomb shelters like the one shown at the end of T3 for over 10 years eating canned beans. Finally, John Connor leads an expedition outside to see if anything edible survived the nuclear winter. Meanwhile, Kate attempts to start an organic community garden, using permaculture principles. It turns out that Kyle Reese really likes fresh fava beans.
Terminator: Under a Hot Moon
Moon Bloodgood strips to 80’s synthesizer techno from Term 1, GnR, Year Zero, Kraftwerk, and other robot related music. Perhaps the most successful of the proposed alternatives.
By the way, I've been enjoying reading the comments on this other blog.
Sunday, June 07, 2009
Shih Tzus Against Hummers?
Now that Hummer is being sold to a Chinese company, maybe Chihuahuas Against Hummers should form a Chinese affiliate. Perhaps Shih Tzus Against Hummers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
